Friday 1 May 2020

AJRI Writes The Supreme Court & High Courts for Installing Public Address System in Court Rooms



To,                                                                        05/01/2017
                          Hon’ble Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar
                          Hon’ble Chief Justice of India,
                              Supreme Court of India,
                                      New Delhi
Subject:  Judicial reforms urgently required for enhancing public faith and trust on fairness and independency of Judiciary.
  Reference to the subject mentioned above we, on the behalf of our trust the Association for Judicial Reforms, India (AJRI) wants to humbly submit the following submissions for kind consideration of lordship for enhancing public faith and trust on fairness and independency of Judiciary;                                                    
1.    That our Trust, Association for Judicial Reforms ,India (AJRI) is working for the cause of Judicial Reforms by suggesting practical ways to all the stakeholders of Justice Delivery System based on public experiences and analytical legal researches.
2.    That as our Trust believes that evolution of present Judicial system within its jurisdictions is the best suited methodology to bring judicial reforms in India, we at AJRI work for documenting the public experiences of litigants and synergize these with analytical researches carried out by our researchers, to suggest only those practical ways which if implemented as per present Constitutional/Statutory provisions could bring valuable reforms in present Judicial system.
3.    That public faith and trust on fairness and independency of Judiciary   guarantees the equitable and sustainable development of the society, absence/deterioration of which erodes the natural rights of all the citizens of democratically ruled societies like India.
4.    That on the basis of experiences of litigants documented by our researchers and analytical researches on “Judgment pronouncement in open Court to judgment conceived by all the parties involved in suits” which warrants urgent improvisation  for enhancing impeccable public faith and trust on fairness and independency of Judiciary.
5.    That majority of litigants and even their lawyers shared that while judges pronounce the order/judgment in open court the voice of the Judge does not reach them while sitting in the Court Room, which creates suspicion in their minds till the oral judgment pronounced in open Court is turned into written judgment, which as per routine takes 2 to 90 days.
6.    That the litigants whose decisions have been pronounced in open court but not conveyed to them due communication barriers remain in a dilemma till a written judgment/order comes, and during state of dilemma his/her faith on fairness and independency of judiciary always remains in a state of pendulum, which is not a good sign for Indian Justice System and should be remedied as soon as possible in the interest of justice.   
7.    That as per Rule 1, Order 20 of Civil Procedure Code   and section 353 of Criminal; Procedure Code the all Judicial Judgments are to be pronounced in Open Court, means thereof that it should not only pronounced publically in open Court but also be heard simultaneously by all individuals present in the open Court. On the contrary to this, in majority of cases where voice of judge is not loud and size of court room is large the judgment pronounced by judges in open courts are not heard by those for whom it is delivered. A judgment is the final decision of the court intimated to the parties and the world at large, by a formal ‘pronouncement’ or ‘delivery’ in open court. It is a judicial act which must be performed in a judicial way.
8.    That as humbly submitted above this situation emerging out of facts mentioned above may be remedied, if public address system is installed in all the court rooms in front of Judges and counsels for parties, then legal communication made in open Court will be able to reach to everybody present in the Court, this simple move would further enhance the public faith and trust on present justice delivery system and also complete communication process as intended in established law.
Keeping in view the above mentioned submissions it is prayed that submissions submitted by us may kindly be considered and in case positively implemented in the interest of fairness an independency of Indian Judiciary, assistance from our side, is always at the disposal of one of fairest and independent justice delivery systems in prevailing world.

                     Dinesh Singh Rawat                    Mrs. Jatinder Kaur
                                       Trustee                                 Managing Trustee
                                                                   
Copies to All Hon’ble Chief Justice of High Courts with humble request for considering of submissions made in our communication in the interest of Justice.

                             Dinesh Singh Rawat               Mrs. Jatinder Kaur
                                                   Trustee                           Managing Trustee

No comments:

Post a Comment